Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Some bicycle paths...
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:31:14 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <v7eiei$34unv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7cg74$2m0u1$1@dont-email.me>
 <53jj9jtab5fqsg547bae3noikuqcrmgp1s@4ax.com> <v7dnnb$2vvln$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7dvt5$31kvf$1@dont-email.me> <v7e14t$31rcs$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7ehb5$34j38$1@dont-email.me> <v7ehgb$34qjv$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 22:31:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="09bd5f1c4b86865bf16ec225ee2ca826";
	logging-data="3308287"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19QBOMThfjhp6ibvD0mib+Or00XHNQ1gGg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ahvv5SMHg2A+AelAeHZmGldCtnM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v7ehgb$34qjv$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4839

On 7/19/2024 4:15 PM, AMuzi wrote:
> On 7/19/2024 3:12 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
>> On 7/19/2024 11:35 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>> On 7/19/2024 10:14 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>>>> On 7/19/2024 8:55 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Politically disfavored citizens do hard time for 'trespass'*:
>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/-right-thing-jan-6-rioter-says-sentenced-25-years-prison-rcna104934
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "... she believed she had the right to climb over broken glass to 
>>>> enter the Capitol ..."
>>>>
>>>> As someone said here recently, "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes."
>>>>
>>>
>>> She did not break the glass.
>>>
>>> Capitol Security held the doors open for citizens exercising their 
>>> 1st Amendment rights to assemble and petition for redress. 
>>
>> I see, is that why the "peaceful petitioners" decided to smash the 
>> windows out of the doors? I'm struggling to see why the "vandalism" 
>> was necessary if the capital police politely held the doors open for 
>> those "peaceful petitioners",
>>
>> https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/211228144847-09-jan-6-capitol-unf-restricted.jpg?q=w_1576,c_fill
>>
>> https://www.usatoday.com/gcdn/presto/2021/01/06/USAT/f5253d0f-3d53-416d-881b-7d1a34c52fff-GettyImages-1294942197.jpg?width=660&height=440&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp
>>
>> https://www.usatoday.com/gcdn/presto/2021/12/28/USAT/b54ed3a4-53fa-4112-b68d-fe0adb474c94-AP21006809982539.jpg?width=1320&height=880&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp
>>
>> I guess this image is those very polite officers holding the door open 
>> for peaceful petitioners
>>
>> https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2022/01/05/ap21133832328925_slide-6b6b89838b8fb9e340b428c8030bedf4ea3e845b.jpg?s=2000&c=85&f=webp
>>
>> let alone why those polite police felt the need to draw their weapons 
>> and fire them.
>>
>> https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/211228143850-18-jan-6-capitol-unf.jpg?q=w_1576,c_fill
>>
>> Sorry andrew, but the narrative that it was a peaceful protest is 
>> complete unmitigated bullshit (read: a fucking lie).
>>
>> What's more disappointing is that you're intelligent enough to 
>> understand what really happened, unlike a certain other deluded 
>> kool-aide drinker in this forum.
>>
>> It was an attempted insurrection. There was no "peaceful redress" 
>> intended. The rioters stormed the capital with the intent of 
>> preventing the peaceful transition of power through violence and 
>> intimidation. Those who were jailed for it didn't get nearly what the 
>> deserved. It was treason, nothing less.
>>
>>> No one's defending felony assault, but most of the 6 January 
>>> prisoners did no such thing.
>>
>> Actually, you're doing just that, trying to claim it was a peaceful 
>> protest to address a grievance. It was nothing of the kind, and your 
>> kowtowing to the magatard mob is very specifically condoning felonious 
>> assault.
> 
> Perhaps I was not clear.
> 
> No one's defending felony assault, but most of the 6
> January prisoners did no such thing.
> 
> Does that help?

No. Even if they were not assaulting security guards or smashing 
windows, anyone partipating in that crowd and entering where they were 
clearly forbidden to enter was taking part in a riot. And their 
objective was clear: To prevent the peaceful transfer of power that was 
intended by the constitution, and properly done every prior time without 
exception.

-- 
- Frank Krygowski