Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7ggo2$3hi7e$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: tau egality in relalivity Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:14:26 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 34 Message-ID: <v7ggo2$3hi7e$6@dont-email.me> References: <D5sf4f-nI4z2kOO5eZjIDNurKmQ@jntp> <v7eo50$35ppm$1@dont-email.me> <xwzk4QdnflJrlwzJfXWvzXJaPy8@jntp> <v7gg0a$3hi7e$1@dont-email.me> <17e3f12140828598$20443$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:14:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="05457785d4e8ee4561f1afbdc81e5bb2"; logging-data="3721454"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1ljQkO5JA2+j/SMF5g/R6" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xsd2pX+w5psTX3BFUIZcYeMFPsQ= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <17e3f12140828598$20443$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2254 Le 20/07/2024 à 16:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:01, Python pisze: >> Le 20/07/2024 à 00:47, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >>> Le 20/07/2024 à 00:08, Python a écrit : >> >> As usual you've snipped my argument and do not even try to >> address it (because you know that you can, I'd guess) >> >>> If two travelers leave at the same time, and arrive at the same time, >>> it goes without saying that the improper times will be equal. This is >>> the very definition of logical thinking. >> >> Using as a condition something that is always true is definitely NOT >> a logical way of thinking. >> >>> [snip repetition of the same babbling] >> >> >>> You refute violently because you have read Einstein and Minkowski. >> >> I'm not using anything from SR, Einstein or Minkowski in my >> argument. > BTW, read what Poincare wrote about non > euclidean geometries in "science and > hypothesis" I did. We've already talked about that. Your point is wrong. > poor stinker Nice signature Wozniak.