Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7ghd0$3im62$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily true? --- Honest Dialogue Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 09:25:36 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 65 Message-ID: <v7ghd0$3im62$2@dont-email.me> References: <v6un9t$3nufp$1@dont-email.me> <v7013v$2ccv$1@dont-email.me> <v70nt7$61d8$6@dont-email.me> <58fc6559638120b31e128fe97b5e955248afe218@i2pn2.org> <v71mjh$bp3i$1@dont-email.me> <1173a460ee95e0ca82c08abecdefc80ba86646ac@i2pn2.org> <v71okl$bvm2$1@dont-email.me> <5f6daf68f1b4ffac854d239282bc811b5b806659@i2pn2.org> <v71ttb$crk4$1@dont-email.me> <60e7a93cb8cec0afb68b3e40a0e82e9d63fa8e2a@i2pn2.org> <v721po$h4kr$1@dont-email.me> <v75a0l$16bjt$1@dont-email.me> <v76dth$1cf96$3@dont-email.me> <v77sna$1o83i$1@dont-email.me> <v78grc$1rc43$7@dont-email.me> <v78if6$1rnr3$3@dont-email.me> <v78jva$1rc43$12@dont-email.me> <v78kmk$1rnr3$7@dont-email.me> <v78m3q$1smtm$1@dont-email.me> <v7akf2$2b79b$1@dont-email.me> <v7b88b$2e2aq$6@dont-email.me> <v7dap8$2u0p5$1@dont-email.me> <v7duea$30pvh$10@dont-email.me> <v7fv6q$3flbm$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:25:37 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c302f5257903c7c25aa8d1f6976e7879"; logging-data="3758274"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19HETeZyjRjThgeOuAVIYxB" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:iP6XFKmdpNYNySYGwsnyYmZ8LqU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v7fv6q$3flbm$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4183 On 7/20/2024 4:15 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-07-19 14:49:46 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 7/19/2024 4:14 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2024-07-18 14:18:51 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>> When you are hungry you remain hungry until you eat. >>>> Before HHH(DDD) aborts its emulation the directly >>>> executed DDD() cannot possibly halt. >>>> >>>> After you eat you are no longer hungry. >>>> After HHH(DDD) aborts its emulation the directly >>>> executed DDD() halts. >>> >>> If DDD does not halt it indicates that HHH is faulty. Therefore the >>> interesting question is whether DDD halts, not when DDD halts. > > This time I made a typo that is much worse than my usual typos. > Pro "when DDD halts" lege "when HHH halts". > >> *By your same reasoning* >> If Infinite_Loop() does not halt HHH is faulty. > > No, the reasoning must be differ. Infinite_Loop can be proven to halt > by a simple inspection of a short code. Similar simple inspection of > DDD reveals that DDD does halt if HHH halts but not whether HHH halts. > Therefore the interesting question, needed to complete the proof, is > whether HHH halts. If that can be determined the question about DDD > is easy. > >> In other words if Infinite_Loop() is an actual infinite >> loop then this is all the fault of HHH. > > Nothing is the fault of HHH. If a program is faulty it is the fault > of the author of the program. Usually an infinite loop is a fault > but that depends on the purpose and specification of the program. > Sometimes a program is faulty if it does terminate. > *Until you understand that this is true* *we cannot have an honest dialogue* _DDD() [00002163] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002164] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002166] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD [0000216b] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD) [00002170] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002173] 5d pop ebp [00002174] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0018) [00002174] int main() { DDD(); } Calls HHH(DDD) that must abort the emulation of its input or {HHH, emulated DDD and executed DDD} never stop running. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer