Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7gqmc$3kclj$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Continuations Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 19:04:12 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <v7gqmc$3kclj$2@dont-email.me> References: <v6tbki$3g9rg$1@dont-email.me> <47689j5gbdg2runh3t7oq2thodmfkalno6@4ax.com> <v71vqu$gomv$9@dont-email.me> <116d9j5651mtjmq4bkjaheuf0pgpu6p0m8@4ax.com> <f8c6c5b5863ecfc1ad45bb415f0d2b49@www.novabbs.org> <7u7e9j5dthm94vb2vdsugngjf1cafhu2i4@4ax.com> <0f7b4deb1761f4c485d1dc3b21eb7cb3@www.novabbs.org> <v78soj$1tn73$1@dont-email.me> <v7dsf2$3139m$1@dont-email.me> <v7dtvf$313uu$1@dont-email.me> <d681d05a13efbbec45fbb5ed7f705f8f@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 19:04:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="123f71f9bf7bcfce6a6a1a7b0ef5375a"; logging-data="3814067"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/PoNfQE5F0zicHxrii+XUCfG+XrRFlXehBe6QkuDH/Yg==" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:vXhBAe0dQuuJF3s5nCOEc0tUFX0= In-Reply-To: <d681d05a13efbbec45fbb5ed7f705f8f@www.novabbs.org> Bytes: 2390 MitchAlsup1 wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 14:41:52 +0000, Thomas Koenig wrote: >=20 >> Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> schrieb: >>> >>> >>> I'm guessing that you would do the exp(-E_a/(R*T)) as >>> exp(-E-a)-exp(R*T), since that should give the same result and now yo= u >>> could interleave the two exp) calculations, and/or hoist the exp(-E_a= ) >>> term? >> >> I don't think that formula is correct. >=20 > It is not:: >=20 > exp(x+y) =3D exp(x)=C3=97exp(y) >=20 > so add/subtract can be simplified, but multiply and divide cannot > (easily). > Now, if we were dealing with Ln() those multiplies and divides can be > simplified. Yeah, I mixed up exp() and ln() pretty badly. :-( Terje --=20 - <Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"