Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7grjs$3kf77$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Continuations Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 17:19:56 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <v7grjs$3kf77$2@dont-email.me> References: <v6tbki$3g9rg$1@dont-email.me> <47689j5gbdg2runh3t7oq2thodmfkalno6@4ax.com> <v71vqu$gomv$9@dont-email.me> <116d9j5651mtjmq4bkjaheuf0pgpu6p0m8@4ax.com> <f8c6c5b5863ecfc1ad45bb415f0d2b49@www.novabbs.org> <7u7e9j5dthm94vb2vdsugngjf1cafhu2i4@4ax.com> <0f7b4deb1761f4c485d1dc3b21eb7cb3@www.novabbs.org> <v78soj$1tn73$1@dont-email.me> <v7dsf2$3139m$1@dont-email.me> <v7dtvf$313uu$1@dont-email.me> <d681d05a13efbbec45fbb5ed7f705f8f@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 19:19:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ccdff6c1e7e8e7cd4872288a041e1c0d"; logging-data="3816679"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187pxXRNH9rTO8CCcu1pct/QsV+ebKXVXI=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BecqP9GlU8NHZLc0uhz9Rd/8ax4= Bytes: 2073 MitchAlsup1 <mitchalsup@aol.com> schrieb: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 14:41:52 +0000, Thomas Koenig wrote: > >> Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> schrieb: >>> >>> >>> I'm guessing that you would do the exp(-E_a/(R*T)) as >>> exp(-E-a)-exp(R*T), since that should give the same result and now you >>> could interleave the two exp) calculations, and/or hoist the exp(-E_a) >>> term? >> >> I don't think that formula is correct. > > It is not:: > > exp(x+y) = exp(x)×exp(y) > > so add/subtract can be simplified, but multiply and divide cannot > (easily). > Now, if we were dealing with Ln() those multiplies and divides can be > simplified. Well, you can sometimes the relation exp(a)**b = exp(a*b), but it is not useful in this case.