Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 22:10:35 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <v7h59v$3mabh$1@dont-email.me>
References: <EKV4LWfwyF4mvRIpW8X1iiirzQk@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 22:05:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="69e2fa5bc9449a59d37de3107cbf2a04";
	logging-data="3877233"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5TeQcP8gixZbImvXC0CdV"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zyo0MUmfWAV+Ci5Z9qoBPgCX2Mc=
In-Reply-To: <EKV4LWfwyF4mvRIpW8X1iiirzQk@jntp>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2123

Den 19.07.2024 21:51, skrev  Jean-Michel Affoinez y Lopez-Francos aka 
Richard Hachel
> I told Paul B. Andersen that his magnificent 
> integration formula
> 
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?EKV4LWfwyF4mvRIpW8X1iiirzQk@jntp/Data.Media:1>
> 
> was incorrect PHYSICALLY even though mathematically it was obviously 
> perfect.

Of course it is correct physically and mathematically according to SR.
What SR predicts isn't a matter of opinion, it is a matter of fact.

> 
> Paul doesn't want to believe me. This confuses him.
> 
> However he is wrong and I pointed out to him that if we could integrate 
> all the proper times, to obtain the sum of the total proper time, we 
> could not do it with improper times, the sum of which segment by segment 
> was greater than the total evolution.

I suppose this means that the equation is incorrect according to
your theory.

So please show the equation for the proper time as a function of
the velocity and the time in the inertial system, which is
correct physically and mathematically according to your theory.


-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/