Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7h5fi$3m6kq$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Hypothetical possibilities Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:08:18 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 42 Message-ID: <v7h5fi$3m6kq$3@dont-email.me> References: <v7gl30$3j9fi$1@dont-email.me> <v7h1fl$3lcvq$3@dont-email.me> <v7h224$3li66$3@dont-email.me> <v7h3je$3lcvq$6@dont-email.me> <v7h55o$2a60$1@news.muc.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 22:08:19 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c302f5257903c7c25aa8d1f6976e7879"; logging-data="3873434"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18l8V1z2ctviB7WETmjOA2J" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:jQX6+ftgebweQKmuimY+76rtvI8= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v7h55o$2a60$1@news.muc.de> Bytes: 2419 On 7/20/2024 3:03 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > [ Followup-To: set ] > > In comp.theory Fred. Zwarts <F.Zwarts@hetnet.nl> wrote: > > [ .... ] > >> Olcott could not point to an error, but prefers to ignore it. So, I will >> repeat it, until either an error is found, or olcott admits that HHH >> cannot possibly simulate itself correctly. > > This has the disadvantage of making your posts boring to read. All but > one poster on this newsgroup KNOW that Olcott is wrong, here. > > Continually repeating your argument won't get him to admit he's wrong. > Richard has been trying that for much longer than you have, with the > same lack of success. Olcott's lack of capacity for abstract reasoning, > combined with his ignorance, combined with his arrogance, prevent him > learning at all. > > May I suggest that you reconsider your strategy of endless repetition? > > Thanks! > So you are going to stupidly disagree with this? void DDD() { HHH(DDD); return; } It *is* a fact that no DDD correctly simulated by any pure function HHH ever reaches its own return instruction. May God have mercy on your soul (if you have a soul). -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer