| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v7hav7$3muu0$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Hypothetical possibilities
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:41:59 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <v7hav7$3muu0$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v7gl30$3j9fi$1@dont-email.me> <v7h1fl$3lcvq$3@dont-email.me>
<v7h224$3li66$3@dont-email.me> <v7h3je$3lcvq$6@dont-email.me>
<v7h55o$2a60$1@news.muc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 23:42:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c302f5257903c7c25aa8d1f6976e7879";
logging-data="3898304"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+pVUcCAuMq4nwSB2sQYCmy"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fB6Z+QzXf+FdCW2CsxAI+RpTAsU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v7h55o$2a60$1@news.muc.de>
On 7/20/2024 3:03 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> [ Followup-To: set ]
>
> In comp.theory Fred. Zwarts <F.Zwarts@hetnet.nl> wrote:
>
> [ .... ]
>
>> Olcott could not point to an error, but prefers to ignore it. So, I will
>> repeat it, until either an error is found, or olcott admits that HHH
>> cannot possibly simulate itself correctly.
>
> This has the disadvantage of making your posts boring to read. All but
> one poster on this newsgroup KNOW that Olcott is wrong, here.
>
> Continually repeating your argument won't get him to admit he's wrong.
> Richard has been trying that for much longer than you have, with the
> same lack of success. Olcott's lack of capacity for abstract reasoning,
> combined with his ignorance, combined with his arrogance, prevent him
> learning at all.
>
> May I suggest that you reconsider your strategy of endless repetition?
>
> Thanks!
>
So you are going to stupidly disagree with this?
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
It *is* a fact that no DDD correctly simulated by any
pure function HHH ever reaches its own return instruction.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer