Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7il93$1mcq$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Is there a test suite for Pi2/armv7 ? Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 10:44:03 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 34 Message-ID: <v7il93$1mcq$1@dont-email.me> References: <v4vk5i$25qk1$1@dont-email.me> <v50fsh$2eebn$5@dont-email.me> <3e7f331360a5c2b4543519607139465bb9741238.camel@munted.eu> <6674b655@news.ausics.net> <v74gh0$umg7$1@dont-email.me> <v788qv$1q95d$2@dont-email.me> <v7ifht$mm8$4@dont-email.me> <v7ih07$vef$2@dont-email.me> <20240721102238.fa3c7bfbd9207304947b0db7@eircom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 11:44:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2da25cc3368fa7f9c49ed7f7fcbaa68e"; logging-data="55706"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/wtpKyS+XgCM0IJ+lv6AcSVx5n052o9Go=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:i8PtZ4dNkxQR9qfaDJpvRv3U7Dk= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <20240721102238.fa3c7bfbd9207304947b0db7@eircom.net> Bytes: 2565 On 21/07/2024 10:22, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:31:03 +0100 > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On 21/07/2024 09:06, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:10:22 +0100, druck wrote: >>> >>>> By the time any type of storage device is reporting errors during >>>> actual use, it's already in a really bad way, and should have been >>>> replaced. >>> >>> This is why you have redundant systems. That’s how the pros do it. >> >> No. Its why you use SMART. >> >> AND redundant storage, which SSDs already have built in > > Yes but the kind of redundancy I thought of first was some kind of > RAID or live backup (I do both and monitor SMART) so that there isn't just > one copy of the data ready to be used. > Oh indeed. My new server will feature two SMART enabled SSDs...one a mirror of the other. I am not interested in RAID. RAID increases availability, but does not archive data -- Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich people by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason they are poor. Peter Thompson