Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ChatGPt reviews Doctor Who - Warriors of the Deep
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 20:23:30 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <v7inj2$23pq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7dst1$15ai$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0ooikjy2zwyi9004@post.eweka.nl>
 <v7gena$3i933$1@dont-email.me> <v7gij2$j9q$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 12:23:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="42aa2328d71cf279735298d8cea21658";
	logging-data="69434"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+o9g30VtupBdfYyitAtbMLgZ7cxjs9hI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kX/qq6AoY4LVaSr3VWGbGRcylTU=
In-Reply-To: <v7gij2$j9q$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2777

The Doctor wrote on 21/7/24 12:45 am:
> In article <v7gena$3i933$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 20/7/24 7:05 am:
>>> Dave-GPT wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Overall Rating and Final Thoughts
>>>>
>>>> "Warriors of the Deep" is a compelling story that revisits
>>>> classic foes and explores themes of war, mistrust, and the
>>>> cost of conflict.  The underwater setting of Sea Base 4 adds a
>>>> unique and atmospheric backdrop to the narrative. Here are the
>>>> individual and overall ratings:
>>>>
>>>>       Part One: 7.5/10
>>>>       Part Two: 7/10
>>>>       Part Three: 7.5/10
>>>>       Part Four: 8/10
>>>>
>>>> Overall Rating: 7.5/10
>>>
>>> That could only be an AI generated review anyway, as no normal
>>> person would rate "Warriors of the Deep" that highly!
>>
>> Correct! The clue was in the first word of the 'review' ... "Certainly'
>> ... implying that there were two identities involved in the production
>> of the review ....
>>
>> 1.	Gobble-de-gook issued some 'instructions, and,
>>
>> 2.	The AI entity produced what Gobble-de-gook posted!!
>>
>> But Gobble-de-gook is too DUMB to even edit "His" post BEFORE posting.
> 
> Why edit when you have to produce the said evidence?

BUT YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are NOT producing this garbage, Gobble-de-gook!!

> You would not make a good police officer.

Good enough to identify that YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that YOU, 
Gobble-de-gook, are a thief for claiming YOU, Gobble-de-gook, produce 
this SHIT!!
-- 
Daniel