Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI
 (artificial intelligence)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 10:03:35 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <v7j4fn$42jt$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v7g5qf$3gjh2$4@dont-email.me> <v7hga4$3oaep$1@dont-email.me>
 <645882704.743219657.314271.recscuba_google-huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>
 <v7hqen$27l4$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <610072942.743220419.056979.recscuba_google-huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>
 <v7i6bd$8bo$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 16:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="057faf46ec5290f43d870ff9ed22591c";
	logging-data="133757"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18E7RfKcN1ctB95i7+REV1MKTocRtvWPNY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XTpnEcPUEMmNp2sgblDoHSuYoG8=
In-Reply-To: <v7i6bd$8bo$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3531

On 7/21/24 1:29 AM, Andrew wrote:
> -hh wrote on Sat, 20 Jul 2024 22:10:06 -0400 :
> 
>>> Name just one.
>>>                         We'll wait...
>>
>> Non sequitur.
>>
>> Because what is the origin of this claim that Apple can only be successful
>> in the marketplace if they do nothing less than �leapfrogging�?
>>
>>> HINT: These uneducated low-IQ religious zealots just make this stuff up.
>>
>> Which is why I asked you for a substantiating citation of what you�re
>> trying to use as a goalpost:  due diligence requires that you didn�t try to
>> disingenuously move said goalposts.
> 
> What's important is that a belief system that is strongly held, and yet,
> isn't based on even a single fact - is referred to as purely religious.
> 
> To wit:
> a. You clearly hold a very strong belief system about Apple superiority.
> b. And yet, your entire belief system is based on exactly zero facts.


On the contrary, the evidence is in the lack of news/drama when it comes 
to product as deployed - the classical "it just works".


> It's classic for Dunning-Kruger people far to the left of Mount Stupid to
> claim a strongly held opinion they can't back up with even a single fact.
> 
> Q: Name a single thing that the iPhone does that's better than Android?
> A: (we'll wait)

See: "It just works".  The ramifications of this as a developmental 
discipline is to have V&V of new technologies *prior* to them being 
sold, to make sure that they're actually work, reliably, in real world 
fielded applications.  A concrete example of this is *not* adopting a 
folding display screen that then subsequently fails/degrades in the 
hands of customers.

And of course, Apple isn't perfectly infallible, for we can cite the 
'butterfly' keyboard failures as an illustration of a mistake made: the 
key thing is to have a corporate culture which minimizes the risks of 
repeating of prior mistakes - which is indicative of why we've had to 
refer to a failure in design from 2015 .. nearly a full decade ago.



-hh