Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI
 (artificial intelligence)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 19:09:34 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <v7k4fe$3vh3$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v7f9pl$1h84$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7g5qf$3gjh2$4@dont-email.me> <h8QmO.5971$Yof.1135@fx02.iad>
 <v7gjls$4j2q$1@solani.org> <v7hq29$23hk$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <1968254190.743220176.946126.recscuba_google-huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>
 <v7hqtv$13a$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v7j4g1$42jt$3@dont-email.me>
 <v7j5qs$2kkm$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lg4um0Feg6iU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 01:09:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="86c825e2ecbfaf0e846b08a360373b5f";
	logging-data="130595"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jxB+lTmkoD1Rnh4zcbBtAWNyRqoLcugs="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2qwPhtzJ56bFyH7E1DL5G0/Rdy8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <lg4um0Feg6iU1@mid.individual.net>
Bytes: 2572

On 7/21/24 1:26 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2024-07-21, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
>> -hh wrote on Sun, 21 Jul 2024 10:03:45 -0400 :
>>
>>>> Can you name even a single smartphone technology that Apple ships
>>>> with the iPhone that is higher quality than its peers over the past,
>>>> oh, five years?
>>>
>>> Already done:  the wisdom to still **not** ship folding displays.
>>
>> I new you would never be able to back up your claim with even one
>> fact.
> 
> Projection.
> 
> Also, it's "knew".
> 
> You'd think someone as bright as you claim to be would know that.
> 

His bloomers are showing...again.

The problem that "Andrew" is having is a belief that no one company can 
be successful unless they personally make every last component totally 
in-house and that every last S&T project will immediately be fully 
successful as originally envisioned.

Reality for both is quite distant from these beliefs.
And it illustrates that "Andrew" has never worked professionally on 
anything close to this stuff.


-hh