Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI
 (artificial intelligence)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 19:24:25 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <v7kfsp$evg0$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v7g5qf$3gjh2$4@dont-email.me> <v7j4g1$42jt$3@dont-email.me>
 <v7k10f$9aen$1@dont-email.me> <v7kf1j$pb$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 04:24:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="06b200e89d114aaed6d5217b54c6ad38";
	logging-data="491008"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LXuvZnpv3zsy6v6sKO19e/06UDOnNGNU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yiIgDUdqNkEEUu3z5bXAj9LCq0Y=
In-Reply-To: <v7kf1j$pb$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 2282

On 2024-07-21 19:09, Andrew wrote:
> Your Name wrote on Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:10:24 +1200 :
> 
>> Apple is reportedly working on foldable iPhones and iPads, but, as
>> usual, isn't going to release anything until it leapfrogs the other
>> makers ... in this case by eliminating the ugly crease down the display
>> and having devices flod out flat instead of having a small bulge in the
>> spine.
>>
>> If those issues cannot be fixed to Apple's staisfaction, they won't
>> bother releasing foldable devices at all and leave that niche market
>> segment to the lesser quality brands.
> 
> How far behind is Apple in integrated 5G modem design, Your Name?
> Ten years?

How far behind is Apple on ARM-ISA CPUs?

> 
> Do you think had Apple spent their money on R&D instead of on marketing,
> that Apple would have only been five years behind Android in 5G modems?

Apple spends way more on R&D than Qualcomm.

> 
> If not, why do you think Apple is always five to ten years behind Android?

"Android" or "Qualcomm"?