Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl
Subject: Re: 2GB limitation
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:17:21 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <v7m471$o8c0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ca9ceb402172bc85450b5a9ac4e18715@www.novabbs.com> <slrnv9s677.1l9n7.avl@logic.at>
Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:17:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29eb5f955e13a8d704edc989f2b069f2";
	logging-data="795008"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HyxpT/hMnIUkhH33UF40U"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gh/WksIQavD0WDcCifHXVd00mrs=
Bytes: 1232

Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> wrote:
> alexandru <alexandru.dadalau@meshparts.de> wrote:
>> Will there be a fix for the 2GB size limit that a string representation
>> have in Tcl?
>> Maybe already fixed in Tcl 9.0?
> 
> Yes, that's one of the reasons for switching to tcl9 as soon as
> possible.

What is the new larger "limit" in Tcl9?