| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v7mbjh$nu8k$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1 Subject: Re: Hungary 2024 - Piastri/Norris Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 12:23:29 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <v7mbjh$nu8k$2@dont-email.me> References: <v7k8hv$afgi$1@dont-email.me> <lg6f68Flfb1U1@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:23:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="06b200e89d114aaed6d5217b54c6ad38"; logging-data="784660"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19giSMASp7oCOivTNn6QWcWsUAoLOWg9Ik=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:3iXBifDRGqUGjmXHi8GxhrXJG7E= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: <lg6f68Flfb1U1@mid.individual.net> On 2024-07-22 00:14, Sir Tim wrote: > Geoff <geoff@geoffwood.org> wrote: >> The call to swap places was fair enough, given that calling PIA in was a >> team tactic. >> >> But I reckon NOR shot himself in the foot by not letting PIA past at the >> earliest opportunity. If he had, he would have had more laps in which to >> potentially overtake him and win the race. > > Difficult to imagine this sort of situation arising when Ron Dennis was in > charge (also difficult to imagine Schumacher/Senna/Vettel complying). > > Given that Norris is well ahead of Piastri in the WDC, McLaren should have > let Lando win. Tough on Oscar, but F1 is a tough sport and his day will > come. > > With McLaren apparently dominant it is not beyond the bounds of possibility > that Norris could win the WDC - I just hope he doesn’t miss out by less > than 7 points > Based on what I read of Norris's remarks after the race, I think there was pretty clearly an agreement between the two drivers that if one of them was ahead at some still-unknown earlier point in the race, then that driver would get the win. That's what the radio message regarding "Sunday morning briefings" was alluding to I think.