Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: BridgeWorks
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:10:23 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <v7msdf$se4i$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7e9qt$33dn4$1@dont-email.me> <v7j9fc$rmh$1@panix2.panix.com>
	<v7m50d$ocuf$1@dont-email.me> <v7m5dh$ofa4$1@dont-email.me>
	<v7m9ck$dk6$1@panix2.panix.com> <v7mh95$qe85$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 02:10:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e8b75ad8e7aaf8b1a754381faa416e2b";
	logging-data="931986"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/kEo71ZEmzzIYpyaDC+/yw"
User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:66iycryD8CTDSsN/rqWEoQM8U00=
Bytes: 1530

On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 22:00:21 +0100, David Wade wrote:

> I know in for example a military setting you can control every port, 
> make sure no one brings in a Wifi sniffer, but in a typical commercial 
> setting?

In a “typical commercial setting”, you are supposed to be able to do 
whatever it takes to keep the business running successfully. That includes 
keeping up with changing security requirements. Particularly if there are 
Government regulators breathing down your neck.