Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: From the Archives .....
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:37:37 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <v7nmjt$142ta$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v7lifn$l194$1@dont-email.me> <v7lk45$la76$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7llol$nn7$12@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:37:34 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7e418b5d28a7b1d0a9cd1d7be3f684f";
	logging-data="1182634"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bOfIlYrTOjHaAYNR54UU12mqqMfxCW8E="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iuASSDhcYNAxgCC5/MHXurB7t7c=
In-Reply-To: <v7llol$nn7$12@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2506

The Doctor wrote on 22/7/24 11:10 pm:
> In article <v7lk45$la76$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Daniel70 wrote on 22/7/24 10:14 pm:
>>> When is The Doctor NOT The Doctor??
>>> 
>>> One of the posters, here-abouts, likes to refer to himself as
>>> 'The Doctor' but, it would seem, he was not The REAL Doctor, or
>>> at least NOT the original, cause back in March 1992, in a thread
>>> titled "Douglas Adams" ....
>>> 
>>> Quote d**....@b****.********.**h.us 31/03/1992 13:46:32 UTC
>>> 
>>> Hey,did anyone ever find out about Douglas Adams dying or not?
>>> 
>>> The Doctor
>>> 
>>> d**....@b****.********.**h.us d*****r@b*******.**n.com 
>>> d**....@b*******.**n.com d*****r@c****t.uucp
>>> 
>>> Send mail to bsbbs.columbus.oh.us End Quote
>>> 
>>> Or did "our beloved" 'The Doctor' go to University in the U.S. of
>>> A.??
>> 
>> Which brings up another point .....
>> 
>> For a great deal of his posting here, to my memory, our 'The
>> Doctor' was greatly concerned with the number of posts he had made,
>> here, ALL-TIME.
>> 
>> So was he really counting just HIS posts or was he counting posts
>> made by 'The Doctor' and, as such, erroneously including the posts
>> by this other 'The Doctor'??
> 
> Therefore your numbers show ...
> 
Ah!! So you don't want to declare IF your post count is accurate or not!
Rightio!!
-- 
Daniel