Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: BridgeWorks
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:11:21 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <v7noja$147q6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7e9qt$33dn4$1@dont-email.me> <v7j9fc$rmh$1@panix2.panix.com>
 <v7m50d$ocuf$1@dont-email.me> <v7m5dh$ofa4$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7m9ck$dk6$1@panix2.panix.com> <v7mh95$qe85$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7n3sl$vf0$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
 <v7n59g$11h0t$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7n7hg$oll$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
 <v7nbmp$12dci$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7ncu3$hth$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
 <v7nffo$12viu$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:11:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c2b3daf16100ba50ecdd68b90fab10f4";
	logging-data="1187654"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18r/UnJcIeCAYtc2A4uxjLY"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:twS31Nl4qm59DP/gmBF4hb/61Ng=
In-Reply-To: <v7nffo$12viu$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 1952

On 23/07/2024 06:35, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 23:52:19 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> 
>> On 7/22/24 23:31, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>> And how has that translated to making us better at breaking AES?
>>
>> It takes less wall clock time to attack it.
> 
> How much less?

The "specifics" are not important. The original statement was once 
secure always secure. I practice this is not so true as long as its 
possible to gain access the system by force.

For example something using NTLM was once considered secure, thats no 
longer the case.

Dave