Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= <hugybear@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:32:29 +0200
Organization: Camembert Normand au Lait Cru
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <v7obdd$17fqi$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <v7o49q$16cpi$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:32:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4bb2e88d07ac17a31fd9c97f629893ac";
	logging-data="1294162"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18q6IGIxj/vjjEtCa13nKZ5XT8MxhPE6/I="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:115.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.12.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bYisR9tIt8TBmMb+wtTD9m8Q8mo=
Content-Language: de-CH
In-Reply-To: <v7o49q$16cpi$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1669

Am 23.07.24 um 13:31 schrieb Chris:
> After being a bit skeptical of Apple's solution, I realised it was a pretty
> good and pragmatic balance between respecting people's privacy and
> protecting vulnerable people. I was disappointed that the angry "muh
> freedom" brigade scuppered it.

It was neither a good nor an acceptable solution. This being the reason 
why Apple decided against it in the end.

-- 
"Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)