Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:27:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <v7olme$19gq3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org>
 <v7o49q$16cpi$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7obdd$17fqi$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:27:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1d5d9efb7ace4f220275209e5b3b6484";
	logging-data="1360707"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+B0BqhN7TXF6GNKn9P0SwTtBaxDJdoMeY="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SzQzdLBE1aDBShLg+pf/p64Ge74=
	sha1:35nx9etgCbggwLLTdWMsP8nvKHw=
Bytes: 1837

Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
> Am 23.07.24 um 13:31 schrieb Chris:
>> After being a bit skeptical of Apple's solution, I realised it was a pretty
>> good and pragmatic balance between respecting people's privacy and
>> protecting vulnerable people. I was disappointed that the angry "muh
>> freedom" brigade scuppered it.
> 
> It was neither a good nor an acceptable solution. This being the reason 
> why Apple decided against it in the end.

It was sunk by reactionary know-it-alls. If anyone bothered looked at the
technology - which Apple published openly - they would have seen it was
pretty elegant and privacy preserving. 

It could have been a really good tool to protect children, but no, people's
non-rights were more important.