Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v7omdr$19its$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= <hugybear@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:40:27 +0200
Organization: Camembert Normand au Lait Cru
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v7omdr$19its$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <v7o49q$16cpi$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7obdd$17fqi$2@dont-email.me> <v7olme$19gq3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:40:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4bb2e88d07ac17a31fd9c97f629893ac";
	logging-data="1362876"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19eHrLgpXsra2VLo7P3SseDOIl+0+AKBRs="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:115.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.12.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nQH9eJ/pDhpqwCblWYrosXkGiU8=
In-Reply-To: <v7olme$19gq3$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: de-CH, en-GB
Bytes: 2309

Am 23.07.24 um 18:27 schrieb Chris:
> Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Am 23.07.24 um 13:31 schrieb Chris:
>>> After being a bit skeptical of Apple's solution, I realised it was a pretty
>>> good and pragmatic balance between respecting people's privacy and
>>> protecting vulnerable people. I was disappointed that the angry "muh
>>> freedom" brigade scuppered it.
>>
>> It was neither a good nor an acceptable solution. This being the reason
>> why Apple decided against it in the end.
> 
> It was sunk by reactionary know-it-alls. If anyone bothered looked at the
> technology - which Apple published openly - they would have seen it was
> pretty elegant and privacy preserving.
> 
> It could have been a really good tool to protect children, but no, people's
> non-rights were more important.

You reaction is Nazi-style: At no point in the discussion you wanted to 
protect innocent children. You probably have a hidden agenda.

Bigot religious groups are the biggest risk to free Western societies.

-- 
"Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)