Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v7orkk$1aart$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:09:24 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <v7orkk$1aart$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga8oqF8qq0U2@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oontt0bare7e005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:09:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d0d0f0c36f6da723f36db057adf7a0bd";
	logging-data="1387389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18LUwDNCkskOhZdAr3FxBgOzCDiqxmQXAw="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qSZW5bGuzgyS9d1BgBzst/phJnw=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <xn0oontt0bare7e005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
Bytes: 3253

On 2024-07-23 10:53, badgolferman wrote:
> Jolly Roger wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-07-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> On 2024-07-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-07-23, badgolferman
>>>>>> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apple declined to comment on the NSPCC's accusation,
>>>>>>> instead  pointing  The Guardian to a statement it made when
>>>>>>> it shelved the  CSAM scanning  plan.  Apple said it opted
>>>>>>> for a different strategy  that “prioritizes  the security
>>>>>>> and privacy of [its] users.” The  company told Wired in
>>>>>>> August 2022 that "children can be protected  without
>>>>>>> companies combing  through personal data."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is one reason many people choose Apple over
>>>>>> alternatives.
>>>>>
>>>>> iPhone.  The preferred mobile device of child molestors.
>>>>>
>>>>> This could be a new marketing ploy someday!
>>>>
>>>> Privacy for everyone is important.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I can't agree with that.  Some people give up their right to
>>> privacy when they harm others or society.  The laws are there for
>>> everyone, not just those who choose to follow them.
>>
>> Your problem is you want to invade everyone's privacy regardless of
>> whether they are hurting anyone. That's the only way CSAM scanning can
>> work, and why Apple wisely withdrew their proposal even though it
>> worked harder to preserve privacy than any other solution.
> 
> No, I take exception to your statement that privacy is for *everyone*.
> There are plenty of people in this world who should have their privacy
> and freedom taken away forever.  Many of them their lives too.

The trouble is differentiating between them BEFORE you know who they are.