Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7p6t0$1c9as$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: WM and end segments... Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:21:35 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <v7p6t0$1c9as$2@dont-email.me> References: <v7jrk4$7rnq$2@dont-email.me> <87ed7m7349.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <0QcM9G1omJ2PKIjSNt0DAeubbXs@jntp> <v7lslt$ut9$1@news.muc.de> <egPMHBTvfiPkgtOjcVsL2aBLYgQ@jntp> <v7mctk$25j9$2@news.muc.de> <hYHBwcZP2l4WCfbU19WrhqVGTLo@jntp> <v7nqqg$1h08$1@news.muc.de> <6I1T1h4irpLul8CAHSeRU-rELD8@jntp> <v7p1vl$1baki$2@dont-email.me> <v7p35j$1bm3d$1@dont-email.me> <v7p3pd$1bnsm$2@dont-email.me> <v7p5d4$1bm3d$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 23:21:36 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0307fbf971d8559d1911245420400168"; logging-data="1451356"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+bm4K9e/3Gdnt+F6Ane1YvPJEWeNYptys=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:p1/c6TyAI2ESEJz2ZV7irpm7CN0= In-Reply-To: <v7p5d4$1bm3d$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2446 On 7/23/2024 1:56 PM, Moebius wrote: > Am 23.07.2024 um 22:28 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: >> On 7/23/2024 1:17 PM, Moebius wrote: >>> Am 23.07.2024 um 21:57 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: >>>> On 7/23/2024 9:49 AM, WM wrote: >>> >>>>> "LLLLLLLL....." is a finite expression, >>> >>> WM is right here. >>> >>>> "LLLLLLLL....." is an infinite expression, indeed.... >>> >>> Nope. >>> >>> Hint: print(len("LLLLLLLL.....")) >>> >>> But by convention (we think -except WM that is- that) "LLLLLLLL....." >>> DENOTES (refers to) an infinite sequence of "L"s. :-P >> >> Well, I was thinking of an endless sequence of L's > > Yes, *I JUST SAID THAT*! > >> not a literal string. > > Sure, but THE EXPRESSION (above) is a STRING-LITERAL, isn't it? > > A programmer really should know that! ;-P Of course. No problem with that. I have been programming for many decades. ".(9)" is a string literal as well, but it can be parsed into a representation of .999..., or one in base 10.