Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v7ph70$1dsq8$6@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v7ph70$1dsq8$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Chipsandcheese article on the CDC6600
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:17:37 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <v7ph70$1dsq8$6@dont-email.me>
References: <v7fss8$3f712$1@dont-email.me> <v7fuqu$3fg81$2@dont-email.me>
	<2k3q9j1lqngjsfmts49q6l3825nipf91rq@4ax.com> <v7k0gm$8pms$13@dont-email.me>
	<a11cff7fe912529a0a7962163afe43d8@www.novabbs.org>
	<v7k7ok$a7tn$5@dont-email.me> <lg6gtgFlcf1U1@mid.individual.net>
	<20240722130827.00004fea@yahoo.com>
	<2024Jul22.145235@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
	<CCunO.76231$oGQf.17922@fx10.iad> <v7n2pg$t929$7@dont-email.me>
	<p6OnO.164803$SLqf.57968@fx15.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:17:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c8cda285a8465d3c50906243df493072";
	logging-data="1504072"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+cmWT1m0wHgkk99R/RUEfX"
User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8c1koBaWvJg8LiXdQrO3KziWZEA=
Bytes: 1863

On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 13:20:21 GMT, Scott Lurndal wrote:

> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
>>On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:09:22 GMT, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>
>>> Basically, the hardware would modify the branch opcode in memory after
>>> every branch to track the last two taken/not-taken states.
>>
>>Did the Burroughs share code between processes/threads?
> 
> Large systems (B6500 descendents) was multithreaded from the start.

Not quite what I asked. I was wondering how those code patches would 
impact on shared code.