| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v7phpe$1dmh2$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: BridgeWorks
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:27:26 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v7phpe$1dmh2$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v7e9qt$33dn4$1@dont-email.me> <v7j9fc$rmh$1@panix2.panix.com>
<v7m50d$ocuf$1@dont-email.me> <v7m5dh$ofa4$1@dont-email.me>
<v7m9ck$dk6$1@panix2.panix.com> <v7mh95$qe85$1@dont-email.me>
<v7n3sl$vf0$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
<v7n59g$11h0t$1@dont-email.me> <669f1ba8$0$708$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
<v7n6rb$11nss$1@dont-email.me> <v7pgh8$1dmh2$2@dont-email.me>
<v7pgnt$1dsq8$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:27:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5aa46971c694eb6a22b215d1e2049678";
logging-data="1497634"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19+PE8ryGsLtjiB6hMe8hqcpaAUBP3IZV8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7d+8eV0J3BOPUs6MHkWxKdVOQGI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v7pgnt$1dsq8$1@dont-email.me>
On 7/23/2024 8:09 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:06:00 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 7/22/2024 11:08 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 22:55:35 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>> AES-128 is toast if/when they make a quantum computer with enough
>>>> qubits.
>>>
>>> So far progress on getting quantum computers to perform any kind of
>>> number-theoretic computation has been precisely ... zero.
>>
>> Basing ones choices of cryptographic algorithms on a belief/hope that it
>> will continue that ways is not good engineering.
>
> Evidence: it’s been about 30 years since Shor’s algorithm came out. The
> “belief/hope” is on the side of those who still think “quantum” computing
> will somehow, magically, any day now, fulfil that long-overdue promise.
You don't think logical. It is pretty simple:
quantum computers quantum computers
do not materialize do materialize
using non-quantum-secure algorithms OK toast
switch to quantum-secure algorithms OK OK
Arne