Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7ri3a$1rs1b$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Incorrect mathematical integration Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:45:02 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 98 Message-ID: <v7ri3a$1rs1b$1@dont-email.me> References: <EKV4LWfwyF4mvRIpW8X1iiirzQk@jntp> <v7h59v$3mabh$1@dont-email.me> <UqTpLIJxvD4VcXT01kWm7g9OGtU@jntp> <v7jnc7$7jpq$1@dont-email.me> <KRDL-sfeKg0KUbMuUiMzTEhYDwk@jntp> <v7mc8d$pmhs$1@dont-email.me> <9w4qQAYIGHNeJtHg4ZR1m_Ooxo4@jntp> <v7p7bu$1cd5m$1@dont-email.me> <oEpFQDJJhcpYoGFheTTVIKntZUE@jntp> <v7qt4k$1obhi$1@dont-email.me> <2DB5P6IpybAncHUWmFdX55lJN7A@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:44:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0c8f57f31bc205e361b3ecf55228bd8d"; logging-data="1962027"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ndx4qf0BXB+uYBozGmgI0" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:nCX12yCrOiMCsP5bIhwTx1ow6sk= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <2DB5P6IpybAncHUWmFdX55lJN7A@jntp> Bytes: 4367 Den 24.07.2024 15:08, skrev Richard Hachel: > Le 24/07/2024 à 14:47, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : > >> Measured in the lab frame the proton is moving around >> the L = 27 km long ring in T = 90.0623065140618 μs. >> The very real speed of the proton relative to the lab is >> v = L/T = 0.999999991·c >> >> γ = 7460 >> >> Measured in the proton frame, the length of the ring is >> L' = L/γ = 3.6193029490616624 m. >> The proton is moving around the L' long ring in the time >> τ = T/γ = 12.072695243171824 ns >> The very real speed of the lab relative to the proton is >> v = L'/τ = (L/γ)/(T/γ ) = L/T = 0.999999991·c >> >> This should be blazingly obvious for anybody but complete morons: >> >> If the proton is passing a point in the ring with the speed v >> relative to the point, then the point in the ring is passing >> the proton a the speed v relative to the proton. A bit more precisely put: In the lab frame the proton is passing a point in the ring with the speed v = L/T = 0.999999991·c. In the proton frame the point in the ring is passing the proton with the speed v = (L/γ)/τ = 0.999999991·c. > > This is the only interesting sentence in your post. > The rest is just nonsense or tautology. > > Indeed, if the proton passes at Vo=0.999991 c (for example) at a point A > of the device, then the laws of physics state that point A passes at > Vo=0.999991c. > If we transpose into real speed Vr, we have: > Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c)=235.7c Nothing is moving at the speed L/τ = 235.7c > > Likewise, this real speed is reciprocal. The reciprocal of L/τ is (L/γ)/T = 0.0001340c Equally meaningless. Not the speed of anything. > > In the proton frame, it is point A which passes near it at Vr=235.7c. In the proton frame the point in the ring is passing the proton with the speed v = (L/γ)/τ = 0.999999991·c. > > Now what does the global ring look like in the proton frame of > reference, and above all what is the trajectory of point A during one > revolution? Irrelevant. The point A is at any instant adjacent to the proton. We consider an arbitrary instant I. Let K(x,t) be an inertial frame of reference which at the instant I is momentarily comoving with the point A. The speed of the proton in K is v = dx/dt = L/T = 0.999999991·c Do you know another definition of the speed of the proton in K than dx/dt ? Let K'(x',τ) be an inertial frame of reference which at the instant I is momentarily comoving with the proton. The speed of the point A in K' is v' = dx'/dτ = (L/γ)/τ = 0.999999991·c Do you know another definition of the speed of the point A in K' than dx'/dτ ? > This is a good relativistic physics question. > > Have fun answering this question... > > I hope you have a lot of fun. > Quite. But your jokes aren't funny the umpteenth time they are told, It is getting boring. -- Paul https://paulba.no/