Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Truth Bearer or Truth Maker
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:34:59 +0200
Message-ID: <v7rohj$9t9k$2@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:34:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="324916"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ilX+r6XwowendwfhA+0QA7F7T7o=
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.solani.org:119
X-User-ID: eJwNwoERACEIA7CVCtjyjMOh7j+CfwlDpsklavH+uqfa4JbpX6FrTMRcZs5hlmp3cByhCjb3cZyAtgOM9QA0bhQ2
Bytes: 1865
Lines: 31

But truth bearer has another meaning.
The more correct terminology is anyway
truth maker, you have to shift away the

focus from the formula and think it is
a truth bearer, this is anyway wrong,
since you have two additional parameters
your "True" and your language "L".

So all that we see here in expression such as:

[~] True(L, [~] A)

Is truth making, and not truth bearing.
In recent years truth making has received
some attention, there are interesting papers
concerning truth makers. And it has

even a SEP article:

Truthmakers
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truthmakers/

A world of truthmakers?
https://philipp.philosophie.ch/handouts/2005-5-5-truthmakers.pdf

olcott schrieb:

 > The key difference is that we no long use the misnomer
 > "undecidable" sentence and instead call it for what it
 > really is an expression that is not a truth bearer, or
 > proposition in L.