Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!usenet.ovh!news.usenet.ovh!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: llp <contact@usenet.ovh>
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Re: Canal+ crash - Re: Annulation : Crosspost excessif
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 23:54:25 +0200
Organization: NUO - News.Usenet.Ovh
Message-ID: <v7rt6h$6i03$1@news.usenet.ovh>
References: <n~3P6.+'=.1@miakinen.net> <v7nelk$g37$1@cabale.usenet-fr.net> <v7p59g$4t3s$1@news.usenet.ovh> <20240724.004328.92387ba5@mixmin.net> <v7qdj6$1gie$1@cabale.usenet-fr.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:54:25 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.usenet.ovh; posting-account="llp";
	logging-data="215043"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@usenet.ovh"
Cancel-Lock: sha256:fOk85ZVe4mcTcHd1xX9+htANO+SD+4EXFrTKSTugm3k=
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-fr
Bytes: 2763
Lines: 42

Il se trouve que Olivier Miakinen a formulé :
> Hello D,
>
> Le 24/07/2024 01:43, D a écrit :
>>>> All your posts are cancelled because they are crossposted between
>>>> comp.lang.ada and the French-only speaking group fr.comp.lang.ada.
>>>> If you want to respect the rules of the French-speaking hierarchy
>>>> fr.* and/or if you want that your posts be not cancelled (on the
>>>> servers which accept cancellations) (...)
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately for you and fortunately for them, none of the 
>>> participants
>>> in the discussion generated by these messages use a server that accepts
>>> your third party cancellations: too many abuses have been seen in the
>>> past.
>> 
>> the op cross-posted this article (later adding 
>> "alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk"), while other replies to this thread retained 
>> "fr.comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.ada":
>
> I don't have the post you're replying to.

You don't want to read this post, it's not the same thing.

> But its author is obviously 
> delighted that the rules of the French-speaking hierarchy can be violated 
> with impunity ("fortunately for them").

I don't see any need for a global cancel on year-old messages
that will only be honored by 4 or 5 servers...

What's more, it reminds all those who know you on the “fr” hierarchy
of your previous abusive cancellations of Pierre Arribaut (more than
3600 anyway). Probably one of the reasons why your robot's
cancellations do nothing on all well-managed servers.

Finally, this reminder of the rules of the “fr” hierarchy is rather
amusing coming from someone who no longer recognizes any FAQ on
legitimate cancellations and who has declared that from now on he will
do as he pleases.

-- 
Admin of news.usenet.ovh