Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7s77k$1v8pi$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Is there a test suite for Pi2/armv7 ? Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:45:40 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <v7s77k$1v8pi$3@dont-email.me> References: <v4vk5i$25qk1$1@dont-email.me> <v50fsh$2eebn$5@dont-email.me> <3e7f331360a5c2b4543519607139465bb9741238.camel@munted.eu> <6674b655@news.ausics.net> <v74gh0$umg7$1@dont-email.me> <v788qv$1q95d$2@dont-email.me> <v7ifht$mm8$4@dont-email.me> <v7ih07$vef$2@dont-email.me> <v7pi5r$1dsq8$12@dont-email.me> <v7rohm$1sdeu$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 02:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7d0ebcfa61568326ad12b060f4099d26"; logging-data="2073394"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lE8CqUpsY8lza76VBIgIt" User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VYDhiXVslfNwjW/t+CbLuocz/Hg= Bytes: 2106 On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:35:02 +0100, druck wrote: > On 24/07/2024 01:34, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> Companies whose business it is to ensure data integrity do not rely on >> SMART. > > No, they use hardware RAID for redundancy, extensive performance > monitoring, and retire most disks before they fail based on the small > percentage of failures of thousands of other discs of the same type. Actually, no. They wait until the disks actually fail before replacing them. > But that's not what the typical person with a Raspberry Pi and a couple > of discs is able to do. The SMART information gives valuable warning of > potential failures, to ignore it would be to employ the STUPID feature > of the user. Unfortunately, SMART only catches about 30% of potential failures. That’s why relying on it is not smart.