Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:54:47 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID: <v7tlf6$oir$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net> <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me> <lgclvsFbd6U3@mid.individual.net> <v7rb0i$1qjdv$5@dont-email.me> <lgda3pF3c6aU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:54:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="25179"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/K78nBTOUAzxlZZCjEWCWQrryGI= sha256:z+ABL0hio3DY3u+FdNJhljSVyGPz3qkXMsiEj0qNCJs=
	sha1:wT04uE8ZpRfq/J/CaF2MJd9hybI= sha256:6v1ovMCjIwHnQpCiNOGrmvEt+XFYLfs1IxiDY4NDz1k=
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL[`N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v  qdYsE`yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
Bytes: 2502
Lines: 18

Jolly Roger wrote on 24 Jul 2024 21:30:33 GMT :

>> By that argument, we must also scrap the traditional system of issuing
>> warrants to search people's homes, because there is a non-zero rate of
>> warrants issued in error.
> 
> Nah. Most warrants meet probable cause standards before a judge will
> sign them. CSAM scanning requires no such due process. They are nowhere
> near the same thing.

When I assess that Alan Baker's IQ is the lowest of all the low-IQ Apple
zealots, I didn't expect Jolly Roger to prove me right on that assessment.

For Alan Baker to compare a warrant which is issued by a judge only after
probable cause has been established on the public record (which the
defendant has every right to object to in court, which would overturn his
conviction) to CSAM scanning of every possible image uploaded, is absurd.

That absurd thought process shows Alan Baker's IQ can't be above around 40.