Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,rec.arts.comics.strips
Subject: Re: xkcd: CrowdStrike
Date: 25 Jul 2024 22:03:32 -0000
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <v7ui3k$euk$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <v7mhb5$qi0k$2@dont-email.me> <v7u9qv$2e0cr$1@dont-email.me> <v7uad3$bev$1@panix2.panix.com> <v7ug09$2f1u3$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2";
	logging-data="10678"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
Bytes: 1722

Lynn McGuire  <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
>Is there a decent IDE for gnu fortran with gcc ?  I tried Simply Fortran 
>and the debugger support is very minimal.  I need to be able to stop on 
>the Xth call to a subroutine and Simply Fortran does not support that. 
>I have 5,000 subroutines (800k lines of F77), 300 common blocks, and 
>500K lines of C++ in over 10,000 files in my calculation engine. 
>Managing that without an IDE is challenging.
>    https://simplyfortran.com/

Eclipse might.  To be honest I just use gdb for debugging outside of an
IDE.  Used to love TotalView until it got too expensive (and I don't know
if it is even available for Windows).

>My Hollerith is gone.  My structures and unions are reduced. The code 
>actually converts to C++ fairly well until you get to the formats.

The older f2c used to do all the formatted I/O with a runtime library...
much the way most fortran implementations do.
--scott
-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."