Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v7uvc7$2hd3p$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dave Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: BridgeWorks Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:49:58 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <v7uvc7$2hd3p$2@dont-email.me> References: <v7e9qt$33dn4$1@dont-email.me> <v7edd2$33v6h$1@dont-email.me> <v7h8d1$3msj2$1@dont-email.me> <v7hveg$3u9vu$3@dont-email.me> <v7j76f$4mtj$1@dont-email.me> <v7lic0$ktou$1@dont-email.me> <v7m5g4$ogvf$1@dont-email.me> <v7m8hf$o37u$2@dont-email.me> <v7ovi5$1b5dr$1@dont-email.me> <v7ph58$1dmh2$3@dont-email.me> <v7q0u1$1jsb2$1@dont-email.me> <v7r15r$1ou0h$2@dont-email.me> <v7s3fb$1uqcm$3@dont-email.me> <v7sf25$245e2$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 03:49:59 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a670b2664521547afa0fc3ac2c83928b"; logging-data="2667641"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18hfcrTwKRYHdfodDapeHLMKnzF7J4x9Dw=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:azxO8P+uh+YVXSellaDH0vb4ueg= In-Reply-To: <v7sf25$245e2$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2416 On 7/24/2024 10:59 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 7/24/2024 7:41 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:56:11 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > >>> In some cases an encrypted tunnel can be used to mitigate the problem >>> of unencrypted or weakly encrypted traffic. >>> >>> But it is not always possible. Like in B2C scenarios. >> >> SSL/TLS does the job in that situation. > > Read the thread. > > We are talking about the case where something are stuck at > an old unsafe version of SSL/TLS, so no - SSL/TLS does not do the job > in that situation. > > Arne > You can always modify and link against the newest SSL stuff, and if you can't then yeah, you got bad software, and practices ... -- David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450 Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.com DFE Ultralights, Inc. 170 Grimplin Road Vanderbilt, PA 15486