Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [article] Doctor Who: Has the Disney Gamble Paid Off?
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:08:19 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <v80035$2qagn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0ooil8930w5xu000@post.eweka.nl>
 <wR6oO.320650$zXH9.253856@fx01.ams4> <v7r103$nc6$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <v7te4a$2925n$1@dont-email.me> <v7thj3$14po$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:08:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="05364ce7262da76e6a42cf571ccb8afb";
	logging-data="2959895"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186sz40dM+992Qgw74B3EyCWp7hxsIWIT0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q3O0rTtSntlilFvlYrEev5JEvqA=
In-Reply-To: <v7thj3$14po$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2463

The Doctor wrote on 25/7/24 10:48 pm:
> In article <v7te4a$2925n$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 24/7/24 11:53 pm:
>>> In article <wR6oO.320650$zXH9.253856@fx01.ams4>, Hornplayer9599
>>> <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> On 7/24/2024 05:07, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 24/7/24 12:08 am:
>> 
>> <Snip>
>> 
>>>>>> SO where is the original article?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Go back up-thread and YOU'LL find the link, Gobble-de-gook!
>>>> 
>>>> He can't do that.  Remember, Gobble-de-gook is incapable of
>>>> setting up his newsreader to thread posts.  That's why he never
>>>> trims his replies to only include the relevant text...it's the
>>>> only way he can see the conversation.
>>> 
>>> As i said, dannyboy is too lazy.
>> 
>> I CAN'T HEAR YOU, Gobble-de-gook, so I've got ZERO idea what YOU, 
>> Gobble-de-gook, said!!
>> 
>> And WHY does it matter if I am lazy (or NOT) when it is YOU, 
>> Gobble-de-gook, that wants to look something or other up??
> 
> You did not look up the original article yurself Dannyboy!

Oh!! Didn't I, Gobble-de-gook??

I think I actually did, Gobble-de-gook, ABOUT A WEEK AGO, when Blueshirt 
posted the original post, Gobble-de-gook!!
-- 
Daniel