Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who The Twin Dilemma
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 00:04:31 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <v80ade$2s2br$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v7tl4g$1f7q$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0ooqxhwbha1a1000@post.eweka.nl>
 <v7ugka$235r$4@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v8012j$2qdcg$4@dont-email.me>
 <v803bi$2tbk$10@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:04:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="05364ce7262da76e6a42cf571ccb8afb";
	logging-data="3017083"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+JfR69fV0n6fU4wR6WbDlnobJDyk9hmPI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lSI+BzEdqDrE8RcvHByTKrxOCmc=
In-Reply-To: <v803bi$2tbk$10@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2859

The Doctor wrote on 26/7/24 10:04 pm:
> In article <v8012j$2qdcg$4@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 26/7/24 7:38 am:
>>> In article <xn0ooqxhwbha1a1000@post.eweka.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Certainly! Here is a review of all four parts
>>>>> of "Doctor Who: The Twin Dilemma" based on the transcript
>>>>> from the website you provided. I'll evaluate each part
>>>>> in terms of narrative, character development, pacing,
>>>>> and overall impact to rate them out of 10.
>>>>>
>>>>> Overall Rating and Final Thoughts
>>>>>
>>>>> "The Twin Dilemma" is a controversial and challenging
>>>>> introduction to the Sixth Doctor, marked by his unstable
>>>>> post-regeneration behaviour and abrasive personality. While
>>>>> the story itself has intriguing elements and some emotional
>>>>> depth, the uneven pacing and off-putting characterisation of
>>>>> the Doctor detract from the overall experience. Here are the
>>>>> individual and overall ratings:
>>>>>
>>>>>       Part One: 6/10
>>>>>       Part Two: 6.5/10
>>>>>       Part Three: 7/10
>>>>>       Part Four: 7/10
>>>>>
>>>>> Overall Rating: 6.625/10
>>>>
>>>> WTF? !!!
>>>>
>>>> Anyone rating this story above 1/10 deserves to win the
>>>> "Agamemnon Statistical Misrepresentation Award 2024" !
>>>
>>> You and I concur!
>>>
>> YOU never were a Maths Whiz, were YOU, Gobble-de-gook!!
>>
>> 6.625 is WAAAAYYY above 1/10, Gobble-de-gook.
> 
> Do you recall how terrbile Twin Dilemma was?

Do YOU recall how SHIT YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are at Maths??
-- 
Daniel