Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v80b35$2rabc$6@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v80b35$2rabc$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Because Olcott has made this error 500 times in the last three
 years...
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 09:16:05 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <v80b35$2rabc$6@dont-email.me>
References: <v7uvbq$2h6oq$1@dont-email.me> <v7vh4j$2ndo6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v807vd$2rabc$2@dont-email.me> <v809pm$2rou5$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:16:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="98ef4f11d97010b63c53911c6d37ff8b";
	logging-data="2992492"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+WGlDTWmQN6q3b4SsBwGx6"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lx1djB2NgX0YLMAMp1SrIDCnof0=
In-Reply-To: <v809pm$2rou5$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2487

On 7/26/2024 8:53 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 26.jul.2024 om 15:22 schreef olcott:
>> On 7/26/2024 1:53 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 26.jul.2024 om 03:49 schreef olcott:
>>>> If you understand the x86 language and can't tell how DDD
>>>> emulated by HHH differs from DDD emulated by HHH1 by the
>>>> following then you are probably lying about understanding
>>>> the x86 language.
>>>
>>> We understand it perfectly. HHH cannot possibly simulate itself 
>>> correctly.
>>
>> You are too stupid to know that a non-halting computation
>> cannot be emulated to completion because completion does
>> not exist.
> 
> The non-halting behaviour is only in your dreams. It is irrelevant, 
> because HHH halts when it aborts. Remember, HHH is simulating *itself*, 
> a halting program, not another non-halting simulator that does not abort 
> and does not halt.
> 

typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
}

int main()
{
   DDD(DDD);
}

When we understand that HHH is accountable for the behavior of
its input and not accountable for the behavior of the computation
that itself is contained within then we understand that HHH(DDD)
is necessarily correct to reject DDD as non-halting.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer