Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 09:37:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v80jd1$2nqsm$6@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <v7o49q$16cpi$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7obdd$17fqi$2@dont-email.me> <v7olme$19gq3$1@dont-email.me>
 <lga95bF8qq0U4@mid.individual.net> <v7q92v$1l4i5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qnha$bnp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgclidFbd6U2@mid.individual.net>
 <v7revb$182$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgda13F3c6aU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7tm0h$1nmm$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgfa27Fcg0lU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7udb5$4qn$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgft48FfbfnU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7v1st$14c6$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lghvvtFq6vhU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:37:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c05bc4d5c20f118509a83fd5add5b73b";
	logging-data="2878358"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Laqv5bDHb2QWbUFZpVvldHkwk+mI79To="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MWF+cXjhsM7q/7R82fNub4ZdEs0=
In-Reply-To: <lghvvtFq6vhU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 2474

On 2024-07-26 09:08, Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2024-07-26, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
>> Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 21:07:20 GMT :
>>
>>>> The question isn't that it's a violation of privacy.  The question
>>>> is whether it's worth that violation of privacy.
>>>
>>> Ask the innocent people who have their privacy violated whether it
>>> was worth it, and see what they tell you.
>>
>> Well, everyone who has photos that Google, Apple and Facebook can
>> 'see', have been violated
> 
> Apple doesn't scan their user's photos for CSAM.
> 
>> Since you lack a normal IQ
> 
> Straight to the insults

When I said he had only one tool (lying), I was clearly in error.

He has two tools: lying... ...and insults.

🤣