Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v813so$30j1r$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Today's interesting development
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 22:19:20 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <v813so$30j1r$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mdqf$je7$1@panix2.panix.com> <v7n0ed$pf5$1@reader1.panix.com>
 <v7okdl$197vv$1@dont-email.me> <v7olas$dc9$1@reader1.panix.com>
 <v7oomt$ha9$1@reader1.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 23:19:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="354bf7870614e782206f43a26f78419d";
	logging-data="3165243"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2QRkRFE5kBwMozATfbq+xOFNMQXdydAY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Bf9OuiCDW1KwD+LdWV2BIiWv2hY=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <v7oomt$ha9$1@reader1.panix.com>
Bytes: 2758

On 23/07/2024 18:19, James Nicoll wrote:
> In article <v7olas$dc9$1@reader1.panix.com>,
> James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
>> In article <v7okdl$197vv$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Ahasuerus  <ahasuerus@email.com> wrote:
>>> On 7/22/2024 9:19 PM, James Nicoll wrote:
>>>> In article <v7mr1t$s1a5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Ahasuerus  <ahasuerus@email.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 7/22/2024 4:01 PM, James Nicoll wrote:
>>>>>> Someone spent $19,000 dollars to stuff the Hugo Award ballot
>>>>>> box in a way that seems either very, very ineptly or in a
>>>>>> manner calculated to be spotted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://glasgow2024.org/hugo-awards/statement-22-july-2024/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, I do recall a case in the 1980s, I think, where an exuberant
>>>>>> fan tried to buy a story he liked a Hugo, using consecutively
>>>>>> numbered traveller's checks to buy memberships. So people do
>>>>>> fuck up comprehensively. But it could also be someone really dislikes
>>>>>> Finalist A and wanted to make them look bad.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or -- conceivably -- someone who dislikes the Hugo award as an institution.
>>>>
>>>> What a half-assed attack, then.
>>>
>>> Perhaps it was more along the lines of George Bernard Shaw's dictum
>>> about wrestling with pigs:
>>>
>>> "You both get dirty and the pig likes it."
>>>
>>> Or "If we throw enough mud at the wall some of it will stick".
>>>
>> Just at this second, it looks like it might be SF's version of the
>> Black Sox Scandal.
>>
> Which is to say, some gambler dropped 20K trying to fix a contest on
> which he was voting.

And/or betting?