| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v81imo$32thj$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Some bicycle paths... Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:32:09 -0500 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 98 Message-ID: <v81imo$32thj$2@dont-email.me> References: <l1p1aj9vhplp4r2qqb2seed6dmmdvletls@4ax.com> <v7r3r1$1nug0$1@dont-email.me> <v7r6v6$1q2ff$1@dont-email.me> <cn63ajhof05ufg9beuuoksdar1uqqrj66k@4ax.com> <v7s82e$1va65$2@dont-email.me> <etc4ajp3jdeq2c6tmn73v98rq7ftuqddkm@4ax.com> <g1g4aj90e4codctdhummefsm8okc8dkt45@4ax.com> <h0j4aj5g5l4hq49o71uhmh6adagrf348q0@4ax.com> <v0r5ajp1mu2d29csdad8gg2bru7gi0femi@4ax.com> <v7v4oa$2lkdi$5@dont-email.me> <52m6ajhqde6dq5ml6n5c3tat7er7pudbm2@4ax.com> <ihd8ajl9cjkf0uhael6vla27f0u2v057fi@4ax.com> <v81f8b$31pcq$6@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 03:32:09 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="50076958179e22d655b964781307c65b"; logging-data="3241523"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18mM7RzNYdc6s9Chbp16wrP" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:fEmiQZPMGjZeQP+Jobcr+UIWYWM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v81f8b$31pcq$6@dont-email.me> Bytes: 5299 On 7/26/2024 7:33 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: > On 7/26/2024 8:03 PM, John B. wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 04:07:04 -0400, Catrike Ryder >> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 23:21:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm saying AR-style guns have no practical value in >>>> civilian hands, but >>>> they impose serious societal harm. You agree they have >>>> no practical >>>> value, and you demonstrate that by not owning one. >>>> >>>> Why do your actions contradict your arguments? >>> >>> <eyeroll> >>> >>> Does the fact that Krygowski doesn't own a pickup truck >>> mean that they >>> have no practical value? >>> >>> Does the fact that most cyclists do not own a bike >>> generator mean that >>> they have no practical value? >>> >>> Simple logic seems to be beyond Krygowski's intellect. >> >> Poor old Frankie. He thrashes around and comes up with >> what he thinks >> is a logical argument but even a tiny bit of research >> would show him >> that: >> "The AR-15s are one of the most popular hunting rifles in >> America >> nowadays, and there are several effective, accessible >> calibers with >> bustling aftermarket's. These cartridges include 6.5 >> Grendel, . 300 >> Blackout, . 450 Bushmaster, and ." >> >> https://blog.primaryarms.com/guide/ar-15-calibers-for-hunting-deer/ >> https://www.hunter-ed.com/blog/3-ar-15s-3-types-game/ >> https://time.com/4390506/gun-control-ar-15-semiautomatic-rifles/ >> https://www.themeateater.com/hunt/firearm-hunting/should-your-next-deer-rifle-be-an-ar-15 >> I could have gone on, there are at least 10 more pages, >> but why >> bother as the first page is sufficient to show Frankie for >> the fool >> that he is. > > Did you really read those? The theme is "Ooh, ARs are > popular. And you _can_ use them for some hunting. Like wild > boars, or Hawaiian goats." But about half the copy was about > the downsides and how to mitigate them. > > "with hunting smaller animals with an AR-15 is that you must > have a superior aim, and if you plan on eating your small > game, the AR is not ideal for the takedown.... ARs for these > animals are typically heavier than those built for small > game, so you may need to experiment with different stocks > for comfort... The standard .223/5.56 rounds are not ideal > for large animals... some states don't allow deer hunting > with .223 diameter bullets or an AR-15 rifle...the semi-auto > action is more likely to malfunction than simpler action > designs...A jammed AR-15 may require more steps to get it > back in the game...the possibility that the detachable > magazine could fall out during a hunt..." > > Overall, it's about the changes needed to make a silk purse > out of a sow's ear. And still, I saw no mention of the great > advantage of being able to empty a 30 round magazine in less > than a minute while hunting. > > I guess that's because it's real value is hunting kids in a > schoolroom, right? > > Right. As with bicycles, different designs have greater or lesser success in various applications. The AR platform in .223 has some advantages at medium/close range where weight matters. Longer distance low MOA is better achieved with larger calibers and varmint shooters like very small high speed rounds such as the .17. Same with a stable mudguard/carrier equipped commuters with heavy durable wide tires. You didn't see even one in the T de F. That said there are magnitudes more .223 ARs than .50 Barretts and equally proportioned numbers of commuter bikes vs real race bikes. -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971