Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v81imo$32thj$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Some bicycle paths...
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:32:09 -0500
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 98
Message-ID: <v81imo$32thj$2@dont-email.me>
References: <l1p1aj9vhplp4r2qqb2seed6dmmdvletls@4ax.com>
 <v7r3r1$1nug0$1@dont-email.me> <v7r6v6$1q2ff$1@dont-email.me>
 <cn63ajhof05ufg9beuuoksdar1uqqrj66k@4ax.com> <v7s82e$1va65$2@dont-email.me>
 <etc4ajp3jdeq2c6tmn73v98rq7ftuqddkm@4ax.com>
 <g1g4aj90e4codctdhummefsm8okc8dkt45@4ax.com>
 <h0j4aj5g5l4hq49o71uhmh6adagrf348q0@4ax.com>
 <v0r5ajp1mu2d29csdad8gg2bru7gi0femi@4ax.com> <v7v4oa$2lkdi$5@dont-email.me>
 <52m6ajhqde6dq5ml6n5c3tat7er7pudbm2@4ax.com>
 <ihd8ajl9cjkf0uhael6vla27f0u2v057fi@4ax.com> <v81f8b$31pcq$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 03:32:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="50076958179e22d655b964781307c65b";
	logging-data="3241523"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18mM7RzNYdc6s9Chbp16wrP"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fEmiQZPMGjZeQP+Jobcr+UIWYWM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v81f8b$31pcq$6@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 5299

On 7/26/2024 7:33 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
> On 7/26/2024 8:03 PM, John B. wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 04:07:04 -0400, Catrike Ryder
>> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 23:21:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm saying AR-style guns have no practical value in 
>>>> civilian hands, but
>>>> they impose serious societal harm. You agree they have 
>>>> no practical
>>>> value, and you demonstrate that by not owning one.
>>>>
>>>> Why do your actions contradict your arguments?
>>>
>>> <eyeroll>
>>>
>>> Does the fact that Krygowski doesn't own a pickup truck 
>>> mean that they
>>> have no practical value?
>>>
>>> Does the fact that most cyclists do not own a bike 
>>> generator mean that
>>> they have no practical value?
>>>
>>> Simple logic seems to be beyond Krygowski's intellect.
>>
>> Poor old Frankie. He thrashes around and comes up with 
>> what he thinks
>> is a logical argument but even a tiny bit of research 
>> would show him
>> that:
>> "The AR-15s are one of the most popular hunting rifles in 
>> America
>> nowadays, and there are several effective, accessible 
>> calibers with
>> bustling aftermarket's. These cartridges include 6.5 
>> Grendel, . 300
>> Blackout, . 450 Bushmaster, and ."
>>
>> https://blog.primaryarms.com/guide/ar-15-calibers-for-hunting-deer/
>> https://www.hunter-ed.com/blog/3-ar-15s-3-types-game/
>> https://time.com/4390506/gun-control-ar-15-semiautomatic-rifles/
>> https://www.themeateater.com/hunt/firearm-hunting/should-your-next-deer-rifle-be-an-ar-15
>> I could have gone on, there are at least 10 more pages,  
>> but why
>> bother as the first page is sufficient to show Frankie for 
>> the fool
>> that he is.
> 
> Did you really read those? The theme is "Ooh, ARs are 
> popular. And you _can_ use them for some hunting. Like wild 
> boars, or Hawaiian goats." But about half the copy was about 
> the downsides and how to mitigate them.
> 
> "with hunting smaller animals with an AR-15 is that you must 
> have a superior aim, and if you plan on eating your small 
> game, the AR is not ideal for the takedown.... ARs for these 
> animals are typically heavier than those built for small 
> game, so you may need to experiment with different stocks 
> for comfort... The standard .223/5.56 rounds are not ideal 
> for large animals... some states don't allow deer hunting 
> with .223 diameter bullets or an AR-15 rifle...the semi-auto 
> action is more likely to malfunction than simpler action 
> designs...A jammed AR-15 may require more steps to get it 
> back in the game...the possibility that the detachable 
> magazine could fall out during a hunt..."
> 
> Overall, it's about the changes needed to make a silk purse 
> out of a sow's ear. And still, I saw no mention of the great 
> advantage of being able to empty a 30 round magazine in less 
> than a minute while hunting.
> 
> I guess that's because it's real value is hunting kids in a 
> schoolroom, right?
> 
> 

Right. As with bicycles, different designs have greater or 
lesser success in various applications.

The AR platform in .223 has some advantages at medium/close 
range where weight matters. Longer distance low MOA is 
better achieved with larger calibers and varmint shooters 
like very small high speed rounds such as the .17.

Same with a stable mudguard/carrier equipped commuters with 
heavy durable wide tires. You didn't see even one in the T de F.

That said there are magnitudes more .223 ARs than .50 
Barretts and equally proportioned numbers of commuter bikes 
vs real race bikes.
-- 
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971