Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v82745$39hi0$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: an scos2 test... Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 08:20:37 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <v82745$39hi0$1@dont-email.me> References: <v7uiuf$2f66c$2@dont-email.me> <v7v6ll$2m54v$1@dont-email.me> <v7vbd9$2mqds$2@dont-email.me> <v7vqeq$2p8to$1@dont-email.me> <v8172o$3151b$2@dont-email.me> <87bk2j65yl.fsf@bsb.me.uk> Reply-To: nospam.harnden@invalid.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 09:20:38 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="887c55572999184d12f7719cf6ccee02"; logging-data="3458624"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199N/13OIMpCgBT/VYN19gy+TkntesWkPw=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:AFJTOre1A9OteMBajMdjEqMrEU0= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <87bk2j65yl.fsf@bsb.me.uk> Bytes: 2635 On 27/07/2024 01:20, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 7/26/2024 2:32 AM, Richard Harnden wrote: >>> On 26/07/2024 06:15, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> On 7/25/2024 8:54 PM, Rich wrote: >>>>> scos2 65 33 >>>>> >>>>> 0ZGS XB sJ@ lH ~i<8/ >>>> >>>> For some reason I am getting a plaintext of: >>>> >>>> ~U9o My 8/g v[ Ym9\; >>>> >>>> using my impl and Rich's original scos2 impl. >>> The key is wrong, try: >>> 28 60 >>> 0ZGS XB sJ@ lH ~i<8/ >> >> Indeed it works like a charm. It had to be a "key issue". Humm... That >> would be a fun test? Try different keys and log "readable" results wrt >> decrypted plaintext? ;^) > > Yes. Somewhere I have a program that just tries all keys. I was going > to get it to stop when English (or C) letter frequencies were found but > it turned out simpler just to eyeball the output. As a human, you can > spot a decrypt a mile off and, if I remember correctly, SCOS has "close > decrypts" that I could spot but which would look, statistically, like > plaintext. > I have one that tries to find consistent incr's in 3-letter word-blocks. Hopefully the correct base and incr bubble to the top. It's better with longer texts, but ... $ cat test.scos 0ZGS XB sJ@ lH ~i<8/ $ ./decode_scos test.scos | ./scos ../decode_scos: Not sure, but ... > -28 -60 > Yes, it can be read. > -71 -60 > =~Bu :C ]}, [~ A~}#s