Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v83161$3dftr$11@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 09:45:21 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v83161$3dftr$11@dont-email.me>
References: <v7gl30$3j9fi$1@dont-email.me> <v7led6$kacj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7lsg5$luh0$5@dont-email.me> <v7nm9m$1433k$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7ofe7$17h8r$6@dont-email.me> <v7qfu0$1m6vf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7r040$1onhe$3@dont-email.me> <v7vlbj$2ofet$1@dont-email.me>
 <v80a2u$2rabc$4@dont-email.me> <v825jo$39i9l$1@dont-email.me>
 <v82u9d$3dftr$3@dont-email.me> <v8306v$3c7$1@news.muc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:45:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c4ee90cee71e7f0114aee78a4820d739";
	logging-data="3588027"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18frW1XxMEotDw5HPeC2IUE"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QOQiR/pK5QBZab17upjC/05OP6U=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v8306v$3c7$1@news.muc.de>
Bytes: 2403

On 7/27/2024 9:28 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7/27/2024 1:54 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> If a simulator correctly simulates a finite number of instructions
>>> where x86 program specifies an execution of an infinite number of
>>> instructions then the simulation deviates from x86 semantics at the
>>> point where the simulation stops but the x86 semantics specify
>>> countinuation.
> 
> 
>> In other words you believe that instead of recognizing a
>> non-halting behavior pattern, then aborting the simulation
>> and rejecting the input as non-halting the termination
>> analyzer should just get stuck in recursive simulation?
> 
> You're doing it again.  "In other words" is here a lie; you've just
> replaced Mikko's words with something very different.
> 

He just said that the simulation of a non-terminating input
is incorrect unless it is simulated forever.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer