Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 18:45:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID: <v83f93$31ac$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net> <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me> <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgcm26Fbd6U4@mid.individual.net> <v7rfko$18sp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net> <v7tiln$2g2b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v7u2gu$2co3l$1@dont-email.me> <lgfmvgFee44U1@mid.individual.net> <v7uduv$11n1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v80bgk$2s7ns$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 18:45:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="99660"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EntByRdTixw+W9JonvxQLJPYGMc= sha256:RqvvvQz/nmAPJ0FwWBsOQmfagzQsGwWKBzvMR3vjUg0=
	sha1:fJbV2ZNci7V90LuxcydJgmcyCFc= sha256:5ZX10hDZdcM8f7ZpZHMZNGizuvUVGy8RGpa63LipTIA=
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL[`N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v  qdYsE`yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
Bytes: 3201
Lines: 32

Chris wrote on Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:23:16 +0100 :

>> Chris just lied about convictions.
>> Why did Chris lie?
> 
> Given I was responding to your claim of "ZERO convictions"...

Do you realize the number of convictions was never in dispute, Chris?

What is in dispute is your claims that Apple/Google/Facebook CSAM scanning
has a 100% conviction rate (which is essentially your claim, Chris).

I realize your mind forms strong belief systems based on exactly zero
facts, Chris - but the way most normal people work is they use facts.

Without knowing what the conviction rate is per report by
Google/Apple/Facebook, we have to assume that it's zero percent.

No other logical assessment is possible (by an actual adult).

And since that's the most important metric, the fact that it's purposefully
left out of the reports is an indication that it's probably zero percent.

Because the people writing those reports are not stupid.
They *know* the only metric isn't convictions - but conviction rates.

You haven't shown a single fact telling us the conviction rate out of the
millions (perhaps billions) of CSAM reports by Apple/Google/Facebook.

Your entire strongly held belief system is based on exactly zero facts.
You simply guessed that all those convictions are due to Apple/Google/FB.

And, as always, you guess wrong(ly).