Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:49:08 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <v83ff5$3a095$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgcm26Fbd6U4@mid.individual.net>
 <v7rfko$18sp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7tiln$2g2b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7u2gu$2co3l$1@dont-email.me> <lgfmvgFee44U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7uduv$11n1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v80bgk$2s7ns$1@dont-email.me>
 <v83f93$31ac$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 20:49:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a727c11014ca40347625e8d70f473602";
	logging-data="3473701"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19G1DP2HA029OvzvEb7QDqVew2BZ72wT6s="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oFpW1XaLXpcoE4drX58x6cq+nDU=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <v83f93$31ac$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Bytes: 2349

On 2024-07-27 11:45, Andrew wrote:
> Chris wrote on Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:23:16 +0100 :
> 
>>> Chris just lied about convictions.
>>> Why did Chris lie?
>>
>> Given I was responding to your claim of "ZERO convictions"...
> 
> Do you realize the number of convictions was never in dispute, Chris?

'It's probably zero given it's the most important metric.
And it's missing from the story.'

> 
> What is in dispute is your claims that Apple/Google/Facebook CSAM scanning
> has a 100% conviction rate (which is essentially your claim, Chris).

That was never once said or implied.