Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v85go4$675$1@panix2.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ... Date: 28 Jul 2024 13:23:16 -0000 Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Lines: 30 Message-ID: <v85go4$675$1@panix2.panix.com> References: <v84bli$3oq9l$1@dont-email.me> <20240728115706.00001a25@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2"; logging-data="21399"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" Bytes: 1705 Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 02:50:26 -0000 (UTC) >Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > >>=20 >> (And of course Dave Cutler took .EXE along with other VMS-isms with >> him to Windows NT, but that=E2=80=99s another story.) >>=20 > >And of course you made it up. >Microsoft introduced .exe extension for relocatable executives back in >1982 (MS-DOS 1.25). 6+ years before they hired Cutler and 11 years >before shipment of the first Cutler's Microsoft OS. That was Seattle Business Computing whose product was bought out by Microsoft and became MS-DOS. SBC basically made a quick and dirty copy of Gary Kildall's CP/M on the cheap without really understanding all the features they were copying. But one of the things they copied well were the file extensions including .EXE for executables. CP/M itself was modelled after RT-11 which is where Kildall got the idea for the .EXE extension. --scott > > > -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."