Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v85gvd$t42$1@panix2.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: Viewing SSH users on VMS Date: 28 Jul 2024 13:27:09 -0000 Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Lines: 16 Message-ID: <v85gvd$t42$1@panix2.panix.com> References: <v83b3h$3c2fu$1@dont-email.me> <v83uvg$3c11u$3@dont-email.me> <v83vav$3j2gr$2@dont-email.me> <v85f4i$3ugle$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2"; logging-data="7608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" Craig A. Berry <craigberry@nospam.mac.com> wrote: >I believe they have said (unofficially) they will do that for LLVM and >have had good interactions with the upstream developers at conferences >and what-not. I haven't seen statements for other products. For >security-related things like OpenSSL and OpenSSH they do need to be able >to incorporate and release updates quickly, which would be a lot easier >if they stayed up-to-date and had continuous builds running so >everything was already ready-to-go when a critical fix comes along. OpenSSH is kind of a special case since it was not too long ago they they, with great fanfare, stripped out a lot of code from their distribution including the VMS support. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."