Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 07:36:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <v87gqe$d2v1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org>
 <v7o49q$16cpi$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7obdd$17fqi$2@dont-email.me>
 <v7olme$19gq3$1@dont-email.me>
 <lga95bF8qq0U4@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q92v$1l4i5$1@dont-email.me>
 <lgcl7oFbd6U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7rda8$1r5n5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7rf50$56o$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v85qi7$iro$1@dont-email.me>
 <v861k2$vom$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:36:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e70da5e2a454b35afc9c2f03b35dbc33";
	logging-data="429025"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VllDDTHD0uhoN1xjDuB+HkErqgBWLwhw="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bOXZZ9H4R1XRQyulZx4+5gMr/C0=
	sha1:ema8vP57haM0tQSSMcxp3b1q8ik=
Bytes: 3077

Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
> Chris wrote on Sun, 28 Jul 2024 16:10:47 -0000 (UTC) :
> 
>>> You can't make that assessment without fabricating the percentage of
>>> convictions, which, let's be clear, is the most important metric of all.
>> 
>> It is the end game, obviously, but it is not the most important metric.
>> As
>> you've been banging the drum about for forever, people's privacy is
>> important so need to avoid as many false positives as possible. Which is
>> what Apple tried to achieve with their novel method. 
>> 
>>> The people who reported all this CSAM bullshit *know* that the percentage
>>> of convictions is the most important metric without which everything is BS.
>> 
>> The NSPCC are a UK charity and are not party to that data. They do not know
>> that information. 
>> 
>>> Given they didn't bother to report that metric, we must assume it's 0.
>> 
>> False assumption. We know there are many convictions and almost all involve
>> digital images which have collected and/or shared via the interwebs. 
>> 
>>> Hence, as far as we know, out of 30 million images reported, exactly zero
>>> convictions resulted - which means every report was a false positive.
>>> 
>>> Think about that.
>> 
>> Apple did and came up with a better solution, however people like you, who
>> would never be impacted, grabbed their tinfoil hats and screamed "foul". 
>> 
>>> Everyone was harmed.
>>> Nobody was protected.
>>> 
>>> It's a classic case of pure bullshit.
>> 
>> Just like you spout 99% of the time.
> 

<snip Arlen's latest crazy analogy>

I think you need to have a lie down. You literally are making no sense
anymore.