Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v87lpn$dsd3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 12:01:43 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 22 Message-ID: <v87lpn$dsd3$1@dont-email.me> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <v82amn$3acnb$2@dont-email.me> <nnNQiU97cYPJ7ikub_NQj-NjNiA@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:01:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e075caedb79b211b2d42510c6c54e6a2"; logging-data="455075"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/QGMoCECHXQVDWIai6K3Dv" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:SxpYA3Vd2izr/etoXQmBQdqbtKM= Bytes: 1529 On 2024-07-27 11:11:52 +0000, WM said: > Le 27/07/2024 à 10:21, Mikko a écrit : > >> First you should study what Galilei said about infinities long before Cantor. > > I did. > >> Fix his errore, if any, and continue what he left unfinished. > > He applied only potential infinity. There he is right. But I assume > actual infinity. In "Two new scineces" Galilei discusses both and concludes that one is not possible without the other. He also notes that what we have learned from finite quatities does not apply to infinity. -- Mikko