Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v87lpn$dsd3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 12:01:43 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <v87lpn$dsd3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <v82amn$3acnb$2@dont-email.me> <nnNQiU97cYPJ7ikub_NQj-NjNiA@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:01:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e075caedb79b211b2d42510c6c54e6a2";
	logging-data="455075"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/QGMoCECHXQVDWIai6K3Dv"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SxpYA3Vd2izr/etoXQmBQdqbtKM=
Bytes: 1529

On 2024-07-27 11:11:52 +0000, WM said:

> Le 27/07/2024 à 10:21, Mikko a écrit :
> 
>> First you should study what Galilei said about infinities long before Cantor.
> 
> I did.
> 
>> Fix his errore, if any, and continue what he left unfinished.
> 
> He applied only potential infinity. There he is right. But I assume 
> actual infinity.

In "Two new scineces" Galilei discusses both and concludes that one
is not possible without the other.

He also notes that what we have learned from finite quatities does
not apply to infinity.

-- 
Mikko