Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v87o2jh7luivuggbp8horr5upblo0qusf7@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: The Ultimate Repetitive Dunce
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:32:52 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <v87o2jh7luivuggbp8horr5upblo0qusf7@4ax.com>
References: <17c9ecced6935d68$249590$3268579$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <v0h4mk$3t9ga$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:32:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c4b7890124bce5a1e744f7a42b238e4a";
	logging-data="4122587"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18CCU+gJwFcsnCLFYncjucz+NWzGw+SseY="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jJlbGNcfyF4DaHyO1TVZMBK1TJw=
OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2055

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>On 4/26/2024 3:58 PM, Lameass Larry wrote for the 1000th time:
>
>> my process list
>
>stfu goddamn repetitive dunce!
>
>
>Tell us something interesting or financially profitable you've done with 
>your tiny-process-list Gentoo crapbox.  And don't lie/exaggerate like Trump.


Yeah, what kind of drain-bamaged fuckwad is this guy, just spewing
idiocy and hate, and narcissistically proclaiming that he's the big
shot.  What a joke.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.