Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v87u43$1kl6$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.privacy Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:23:48 -0000 (UTC) Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) Message-ID: <v87u43$1kl6$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net> <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me> <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgcm26Fbd6U4@mid.individual.net> <v7rfko$18sp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net> <v7tiln$2g2b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v7u2gu$2co3l$1@dont-email.me> <lgfmvgFee44U1@mid.individual.net> <v7uduv$11n1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v80bgk$2s7ns$1@dont-email.me> <v83f93$31ac$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v860er$1kea$1@dont-email.me> <v86141$j$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v87e4d$ckpm$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:23:48 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com; logging-data="53926"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ibAsDh5SP9/1Gs376DATn6/w6/0= sha256:bXArftbEQVCH27/vualqHBD7D6vxF15CfwhU7YFBTyU= sha1:Wi0UPn7fPoLyp4a5b+65griJMWM= sha256:JskoiItxFC4dAR6OrXsDZTK4s2Ar8s+yRq9zQr6XhWY= X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL[`N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v qdYsE`yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W} Bytes: 3790 Lines: 40 Chris wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:50:53 -0000 (UTC) : >> You not comprehending the difference between zero percent of Apple reports >> versus zero total convictions is how I know you zealots own subnormal IQs. > > Not at all. My position hasn't changed. You, however, have had about three > different positions on this thread and keep getting confused which one > you're arguing for. lol. Au contraire Because I only think logically, my rather sensible position has never changed, Chris, and the fact you "think" it has changed is simply that you don't know the difference between the percentage of convictions based on the number of reports, and the total number of convictions. When you figure out that those two things are different, then (and only then) will you realize I've maintained the same position throughout. Specifically.... a. If the Apple reporting rate is low, and yet if their conviction rate is high (based on the number of reports), then they are NOT underreporting images. b. If the FB/Google reporting rate is high, and yet if their conviction rate is low (based on the number of reports), then they are overreporting images. c. None of us know if either is true unless and until we know the conviction rates per Apple, Facebook, & Google - which are not in the reports (which were aimed to lambaste Apple). d. That conviction rate information is so important, that nobody is so stupid to not ASK for it BEFORE making any assessments. e. Given the people who wrote those reports are not likely to be stupid, the fact they left out the most important factor, directly implies the obvious, based on the omission itself. Now what do you think that omitted fact directly implies, Chris?