Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:04:13 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <v88sjt$hbk9$1@solani.org>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org>
 <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me>
 <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7rclq$1r24r$2@dont-email.me>
 <lgdac6F3c6aU4@mid.individual.net>
 <v80bju$2s7ns$2@dont-email.me>
 <lgi05eFq6vhU2@mid.individual.net>
 <v80j93$2nqsm$5@dont-email.me>
 <lgildlFtal2U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v85r6s$mgr$1@dont-email.me>
 <lgni5gFl7shU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v87gf2$d1eu$1@dont-email.me>
 <lgpqjfF17veU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v88jf8$j1j9$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:04:13 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="568969"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VBocPxkknylZZWfViKBfFPas9dA= sha1:XI4uvLr/aZ7FnF8BF94qwdarHO8=
X-User-ID: eJwNyskBwCAMA7CVCDjXOGDw/iO0estXWDARHnC5Xt1j1u5ZgxoLNC5EgJz2356zWEo2sFN31tt+1NIweeEDOhkVFA==
Bytes: 2355
Lines: 15

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-07-29, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Actually, a human being does review it with Google's system:
> 
> I was unclear. I'm not saying a human doesn't review, I'm saying that given
> the dozens/hundreds of images of suspected abuse images they review a day
> they won't have the ability to make informed decisions. 
> 
>> --- 
>> A human content moderator for Google would have reviewed the photos
>> after they were flagged by the artificial intelligence to confirm they
>> met the federal definition of child sexual abuse material.

What kind of a person would want this job?