Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v88uk9$ksba$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 21:38:33 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <v88uk9$ksba$1@dont-email.me> References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net> <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me> <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v7rclq$1r24r$2@dont-email.me> <lgdac6F3c6aU4@mid.individual.net> <v80bju$2s7ns$2@dont-email.me> <lgi05eFq6vhU2@mid.individual.net> <v80j93$2nqsm$5@dont-email.me> <lgildlFtal2U1@mid.individual.net> <v85r6s$mgr$1@dont-email.me> <lgni5gFl7shU3@mid.individual.net> <v87gf2$d1eu$1@dont-email.me> <lgpqjfF17veU1@mid.individual.net> <v88jf8$j1j9$1@dont-email.me> <v88sjt$hbk9$1@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:38:34 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ddbc5538cdb7d7e8b7525f1d4db41ff9"; logging-data="684394"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ueFN8im5deROd820K/HsZoE23khwRMFk=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:yu9ZGmlEPqS1XgTQiFAZRAI7hfo= In-Reply-To: <v88sjt$hbk9$1@solani.org> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2660 On 29/07/2024 21:04, badgolferman wrote: > Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>> On 2024-07-29, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Actually, a human being does review it with Google's system: >> >> I was unclear. I'm not saying a human doesn't review, I'm saying that given >> the dozens/hundreds of images of suspected abuse images they review a day >> they won't have the ability to make informed decisions. >> >>> --- >>> A human content moderator for Google would have reviewed the photos >>> after they were flagged by the artificial intelligence to confirm they >>> met the federal definition of child sexual abuse material. > > What kind of a person would want this job? I read an article a couple of years ago on the Facebook content moderators. Many ended up traumatised and got no support. God it was a grim read.